Pic de Finestrelles – Pic Gaspard (Ecrins) | 443 km.

Beyond Horizons

Current World Record of distant landscape photography

bp1410102-mbret.jpgBarre des Écrins (4.102 m) is in the middle left of the image.
Taken from Pic de Finestrelles (2.820 m)  at 440 Km, before sunrise.
In the rest of the pictures, another summits can be seen further away.
By Marc Bret (Beyond Horizons team)
Camera Panasonic Lumix FZ72 @ ISO100 – 1/250
Lens Integrated Zoom @ 1200 mm – f./2.8
Date July 16th 2016
Portraying the silhouette of the Barre des Ecrins from the most distant possible summit of the Pyrenees and get a new World Distance Record has been for us the last most recent target. The result is counted in the image: a view from Pic de Finestrelles (2.820 m.) to the Alps.

Want to try yourself? Don’t forget to check our reccommended cameras!

View original post 382 more words

Advertisements

Media won’t investigate medically caused death numbers May 16 by Jon Rappoport

via Media won’t investigate medically caused death numbers

 

By Jon Rappoport

Imagine a Congressional hearing held before media cameras, with reporters all over the US and Europe ready with shocking articles about one of the leading causes of death—

SENATOR: Sir, I have the numbers in front of me. How can you keep this secret from the public?

FDA COMMISSIONER: It’s not a secret, sir. Many experts know about it.

SENATOR: I’m looking through the trillion-dollar federal budget. I’m looking for the money allocated to fix this horrible situation. Where are those funds?

FDA COMMISSIONER: Nowhere.

I know major media won’t investigate medically-caused death numbers, because I’ve published reports for years, and I’ve contacted news people with the facts; and nothing happens.

So we begin with a few citations.

July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; “Is US health really the best in the world?”

Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans a year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that last number again.

I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of any overall effort by the US government to eliminate this holocaust, and whether she had ever been contacted by any government agency to consult on such an effort. She answered a resounding no to both questions.

Here is another citation: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”

The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”

The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”

Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans.

Here is another citation: The article is, “The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and is the 2013 recipient of ASA’s [American Sociological Association’s] Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University.

Donald Light: “Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.” (ASA publication, “Footnotes,” November 2014)

The statistics I’m quoting reveal a problem on the level of a tsunami sweeping across the whole of America and Europe.

Why won’t major media report these facts?

The obvious reason: their big-spending pharmaceutical advertisers would drop them like hot potatoes.

But there are other reasons.

Every medical bureaucrat or medical shill or medical expert who jumps aboard the media train, to assure the public that drugs and vaccines are remarkably safe, is sitting on the time bomb I have described above.

This is a key, key fact. If this bomb were widely recognized, who would continue to believe these professional pundits? Who would accept anything they say? How could they possibly sustain their credibility?

“Well, the system I represent kills 2.25 million people per decade, and maims between 20 and 40 million more people per decade, but I want to assure you this vaccine presents no problems at all. It’s incredibly safe.”

Every single pronouncement, on any subject, issued via the medical cartel’s Ministry of Truth would fall on disbelieving ears, and only increase general outrage.

Mainstream reporters and editors and publishers are well aware that telling the truth and continuing to pound on it would undermine a basic institution of society.

The media are there to give credibility to society and its structures. That’s why they’re called “major” instead of “minor.”

When hard rains fall, the media are there with an umbrella to hold over organized society’s head. To walk away in the middle of a downpour would leave the status quo unprotected.

“Defending the Crown” is another way to put it. The King may make mistakes, he may commit heinous offenses, but he is the King, and therefore his position must remain secure.

Young journalists learn this point quickly. If in their zeal, they cross the threshold and attempt to expose a central myth, fairy tale, legend, they’re put back in their place. They absorb the message. Journalism has limits. Certain truths are silent truths.

Over the years, I’ve talked to reporters who are solidly addicted to obfuscations. Like any addict, they have an army of excuses to rationalize their behavior.

The medical experts are worse. Their pretense of idealism knows no limits, and is matched only by their claim to bullet-proof knowledge.

When you peel the veneer away, they are enablers, persons of interest, co-conspirators.

There is nothing quite like a high-minded, socially-positioned, card-carrying member of the King’s circle of protectors. The arrogance is titanic. Because what is being hidden is so explosive.

225,000 deaths a year at the hands of modern medicine. Two to four million maimings. 2.25 million deaths per decade. The Crown is responsible.

And yet it is the duty of the Crown to make his subjects feel safe and protected and even loved.

No wonder he needs such a large army of trained helpers in and around the press.

He has them.

But their monopoly is breaking down.

We’re at the beginning of a new breakout level of truth. It’s called independent media.

Stay tuned.

Did US Nerve Gas Poison Our Own Troops In First Gulf War?

COMMON SENSE

troops MOST COMPREHENSIVE POST EVER: Head Of Pentagon Intelligence: List Of Purged Military High Officers Is ‘Terrifying’…

By Jonah Bennett

More than 200,000 of the 700,000 U.S. troops sent to Iraq and Kuwait during the Gulf War were hit by nerve gas, a fact the Department of Defense continues to deny and cover up.

But the effects of the nerve gas are undeniable, Newsweek reports. Troops who were nearest the nerve gas are suffering at non-trivial rates which seemingly can’t be chalked up to randomness. A clear pattern is emerging.

Medical experts are recording cancer rates at two or three times above average for the exposed troop population. In 2013, Jim Tuite and Dr. Robert Haley published an article in the journal Neuroepidemiology, finding that “large numbers of U.S. and Coalition military personnel were exposed to levels of sarin … high enough to cause irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse…

View original post 582 more words

THE BIBLE and CALAMUS vs. CANNABIS

standingupfortruth

                                          THE BIBLE and CALAMUS vs. CANNABIS:

With the Hebrew words for “calamus” and “cannabis” so similar, and the fact that calamus is of lesser value and also toxic, we must question the validity of the term “calamus” in English versions of Scripture. 

The word calamus is found in the KJV three times:
Exodus 30:23 God telling Moses the formula for the anointing oil (250 shekels worth.)
KJV-sweet calamus
NKJV-sweet-smelling cane
ESV-aromatic cane
NASB-fragrant cane
Song of Solomon 4:14, speaking of it in a refreshing garden
Ezekiel 27:19 speaking of cane as merchandise.

The KJV translates the Hebrew word “qaneh” (pronounced kaw-naw’) into “calamus.”  Per Strong’s Concordance, “qaneh” means “a reed (as erect); by resemblance a rod (especially for measuring) shaft, tube, stem, (the radius of the arm) beam (of a steelyard): – balance, bone, branch, calamus, cane, reed, spearman, stalk.”

The Hebrew word for “calamus” is “kanah…

View original post 575 more words

!I Stand With Israel! {Which One?}

!I Stand With Israel! {Which One?}

COMMON SENSE

!I Stand with Israel!

#IstandwithIsrael

{???Which one???}

BY Pat N. DeHat

clip_image002[4]

 

A closer look at what and whom you are supporting. 

Revelation 2:9 KJV 

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

– King James Bible “Authorized Version”, Cambridge Edition 

I copied and posted this write-up to bring forth the question, “Which Israel am I supposed to stand with? If any person tells you to “Stand with Israel”, do you know which Israel they are speaking of?

INTRODUCTION

There is a great deal of misunderstanding today in the reading and interpretation of Scripture. This confusion has been caused by the faulty comparison of the terms and meanings for Israel, Judah, and Jew. Many theologians and sincere Christians are…

View original post 7,923 more words

How to silence an anti-Glober

How to silence an anti-Glober

I know there are many people out there that are embarrassed of that one anti “Globe” friend or family member that just sounds so silly, talking about how the earth is not a globe, or even better yet, that it’s flat. You get so irritated, that your afraid to even invite them for the get togethers any more. Sure everybody knows that there is empirical evidence that can prove it’s a globe. Right? So once and for all, pull out that evidence and show it to them. Finally, be able to shut-them-up. I’ll try to make it easy, and use the evidence that usually gets used.
goggles2.jpg
1. All the evidence NASA has given us over the years, should be more than enough to prove it’s a globe. Then again, neither NASA, nor our government have never been known for there actual photos of space or even their honesty. So, I guess we can’t use NASA.

Here is a link to ISS photos that validate flat earthers theories.
https://patinthehat00.wordpress.com/2016/06/20/space-station-photos-validate-flat-earth/
NASA lies.jpg
2. How about those stars, then. Just look at the stars, themselves. There movements should definitely prove that we live in heliocentric universe, spinning and rotating with other moons and planets moving around us at the same time. Well…, actually, what it shows is that somehow, there is a star that seems to never move. Yeah. No kidding. Freaked me out too. All the moving through space that is said to happen, and Polaris, what we use for directional help, is always at our north. That’s only the half of it. The rest of the stars, all make a circle around that one star, Polaris too.  I guess we can’t use that to silence that person.
stars
3. The Bible. That’s the ticket. They can’t deny that. Or can they? It seems as though there are many verses that speak of the earth and how it’s created and they all seem to steer toward the flattish shape. Sorry. I thought I had em there. But the following link will bring you to those verses.
http://www.testingtheglobe.com/bible.html

flat earth history.jpg
Truth is, there is no empirical evidence that says the earth is a globe. Only conjecture, propaganda and pompous insults. Which brings us to the point of the article.

So, how DO you deal with an anti-“Glober”?

a reminder.jpg
You listen to what they have to say, and test the evidence they say they have, together, if that could be done. Before you begin, you may want to keep one, very important thing in mind. It is not a competition. it is a fact finding expedition. Just because they can show you that you were lied to about the cult, I call the “Globers”, doesn’t mean that they know what it is. Only that there are other possibilities, than what we were taught.

faith.jpg
glober.jpg